Matches SemVer (Semantic Versioning) strings. The string MAY start with a "v" but it is not matched. /(?<=^[Vv]|^)(?:(?<major>(?:0|[1-9](?:(?:0|[1-9])+)*))[.](?<minor>(?:0|[1-9](?:(?:0|[1-9])+)*))[.](?<patch>(?:0|[1-9](?:(?:0|[1-9])+)*))(?:-(?<prerelease>(?:(?:(?:[A-Za-z]|-)(?:(?:(?:0|[1-9])|(?:[A-Za-z]|-))+)?|(?:(?:(?:0|[1-9])|(?:[A-Za-z]|-))+)(?:[A-Za-z]|-)(?:(?:(?:0|[1-9])|(?:[A-Za-z]|-))+)?)|(
Timely Project Versioning About Users 中文 GitHub CalVer is a versioning convention based on your project's release calendar, instead of arbitrary numbers. Versioning gets better with time. For maintainers, versioning allows us to specify precise dependencies within an ever-expanding ecosystem. For sellers and promoters, a project's version is a dynamic part of a brand. For all of us, versioning let
Last week, the proposal review committee accepted the “vgo approach” elaborated on this blog in February and then summarized as proposal #24301. There has been some confusion about exactly what that means and what happens next. In general, a Go proposal is a discussion about whether to adopt a particular approach and move on to writing, reviewing, and releasing a production implementation. Accepti
These are the posts in the February 2018 “Go & Versioning” series: “Go += Package Versioning” [PDF]. “A Tour of Versioned Go (vgo)” [PDF]. “Semantic Import Versioning” [PDF]. “Minimal Version Selection” [PDF]. “Reproducible, Verifiable, Verified Builds” [PDF]. “Defining Go Modules” [PDF]. “Versioned Go Commands” [PDF]. The official Go proposal is at https://golang.org/issue/24301, filed on March 2
A new major version of Electron is in the works, and with it some changes to our versioning strategy. As of version 2.0.0, Electron will strictly adhere to Semantic Versioning. This change means you'll see the major version bump more often, and it will usually be a major update to Chromium. Patch releases will also be more stable, as they will now only contain bug fixes with no new features. Major
February 25, 2015 On Versioning In a recent outburst on Twitter and Github, Jeremy Ashkensas and David Heinemeier Hansson argue for Romantic Versioning (versioning with heart) rather than Semantic Versioning (functionally meaningful versioning). I argue that the debate has been lacking nuance, and provide a model for deciding on how to version a given project. Recently, Semantic Versioning has bee
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く