User talk:Labattblueboy

• 1 Category:Hotel Christol
• 2 Category:Mémorial des Martyrs de la Déportation
• 3 Commons talk:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lorraine American Cemetery and Memorial‎
• 4 Notification about possible deletion
• 5 Category:Ministry of Information Second World War Press Agency Print Collection
• 6 Code issues in User:Labattblueboy/common.js
• 7 Your VFC installation method is deprecated
• 8 File:Charles Georges Dufresne-Noyon-1917.jpg
• 9 File:Charles Dufresne Patio à Alger.jpg
• 10 Photographer's license
• 11 Copyright status: File:Carte de la commune de Courtecon 1888.jpg
• 12 PD-Assumed
• 13 World War I cemeteries
• 14 Welcome, Dear Filemover!
• 15 File:SarajevoRose.jpg
• 16 Community Insights Survey
• 17 Reminder: Community Insights Survey
• 18 Reminder: Community Insights Survey
• 19 Important message for file movers
• 20 Tour Jacob‎
• 21 File:Wyndham Lewis-A Canadian Gun-pit.jpg
• 22 Copyright status: File:Solomon Joseph Solomon-The Right Hon Sir George Halsey Perley (CWM 19710261-0663).jpg
• 23 Copyright status: File:Arthur Crisp-Recruitment Parade, New York (Verso) (CWM 19710261-0824).jpg
• 24 Baron Boyce's Death
• 25 Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Bonjour. Je ne vois dans la catégorie en objet aucune photographie qui illustre l'hôtel en question mais seulement des dessins -> Boulogne in art. D'où ma suppression sans ciller.--Totorvdr59 (talk) 18:22, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

• Before to create a deletion request of a photo, please look if the discussion page of the photo exists. Because if it exists, you can find here if there was already a discussion about the deletion of the photo. For example : File talk:Memorial de la Deportation.jpg shows that there was already a discussion in 2013.
• You have to learn what is Commons:De minimis exception : if the monument is only a part of the photo, it may be kept.
• Please look also the details of Commons:FOP. Because the monuments or buildings under the threshold of originality may be kept.

Best regards. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While this cemetery where Americans are interred may be on French soil, it should be afforded the same level of courtesy as a consulate since it is managed by the United States Government. Understand that this post in wiki is designed to keep alive the memory of those who fought alongside our French allies. Removal of the photos over a petty and barely sufficient framework is not in keeping with the spirit with which SSG Rivers and others lived and died for. Therefore, I request that you withdraw your request for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumpmaster1906 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:The Battle of Vimy Ridge.jpg

Yours sincerely, Jarry1250 (talk) 19:12, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to create this category? I notice you've populated it, but at present it's just sitting there inchoate. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodhullandemu: thanks for the catch. Cheers.--Labattblueboy (talk) 13:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HiLabattblueboy, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Labattblueboy/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}}toyour user pageorcmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 22:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Hello Labattblueboy, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Work is not the work of the uploader. Dufresne died in in 1938 (so life + 70 years isn't a concern) however there is no information as to where this image came from. Labattblueboy (talk) 16:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I am not the painter, but the photographer who took the picture (and many others) in Metz during the exhibition called 1917. I cannot see any problem here. Do you ? -- Ji-Elle (talk) 16:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is that what you are looking for ? [1]. Ji-Elle (talk) 05:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Work is not the work of the uploader. Dufresne died in in 1938 (so life + 70 years isn't a concern) however there is no information as to where this image came from. Labattblueboy (talk) 30 September 2017 (UTC).

Of course I am not the painter, I myself took the picture during the exhibition Jardins d'Orient. De l'Alhambra au Taj Mahal at the Institut du Monde Arabe in Paris (Institut du Monde Arabe Exposition Jardins d'Orient) on 21 June 2016. the exhibition lasted from 19 April 2016 untill 25 September 2016. So I dont' see any problem ?. Thomon (d) 12ː22 2 October 2017 (UTC).

Hi, please don't remove the license of the photographer like you did here. A picture of a painting in a 3D frame is not a 2D reproduction. Jcb (talk) 23:05, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Jcb: cna you advise whether File:Piet mondrian, compoisizione in rosso, blu e bianco II, 1937, 01.JPG is a clear way of amending the image files so they are in fact complete while still ensuring the photographer and CC tag is clear?--Labattblueboy (talk) 23:58, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think this is good enough. If you wish you can empty the 'author' field if the artist is in the 'artist' field and the photographer is in the 'source' field. Jcb (talk) 00:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Carte de la commune de Courtecon 1888.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Carte de la commune de Courtecon 1888.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 07:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid using this template on photographs which are not, or may not be, over 120 years old. E.g. File:Chivy-et-Beaulne Rue de l'Hopital.jpg. --Fæ (talk) 11:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fæ: No worries. Thanks for the clean-up on the image, it's appreciated.--Labattblueboy (talk) 13:31, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Category:Cimetière du Nord (Périgueux) is not a World War I cemetery [2] but only 5 photographs (see Category:World War I cemeteries in Nouvelle-Aquitaine). Père Igor (talk) 14:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is but no worries, I've created a sub-cat for the carré militaire. I hope this resolves the concern.--Labattblueboy (talk) 15:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Labattblueboy, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:05, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're the original uploader on Wikipedia, what should the license for this undeleted photograph be? Abzeronow (talk) 22:20, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Labattblueboy,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Labattblueboy,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Labattblueboy,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Acommunity discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Three different gates in Luxembourg are / were named Porte de Trèves: the first was Krudelspaart (Category does not exist yet), the second was Tour Jacob (also known as 1st Trier gate) and finally 2nd Trier gate 2e Porte de Trèves. This explains why - in my opinion - Porte de Trèves (Luxembourg City) should be the main category and Krudelspaart, Tour Jacob, 2e Porte de Trèves should be sub-categories. GilPe (talk) 20:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to Tour Jacob, I have no issue in adding an additional category for Porte de Trèves, it was a former name (well documented) so seems reasonable. I don't see removing the other categories as appropriate. I have not seen any material that refers to this gate "1st Trier gate", Krudelspaart/Krudelsport as Porte de Trèves but that's a different matter.--Labattblueboy (talk) 02:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wyndham Lewis-A Canadian Gun-pit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rrburke (talk) 13:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Solomon Joseph Solomon-The Right Hon Sir George Halsey Perley (CWM 19710261-0663).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Solomon Joseph Solomon-The Right Hon Sir George Halsey Perley (CWM 19710261-0663).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Frederick Varley-Captain C.P.J. O'Kelly (CWM 19710261-0768).jpeg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) 21:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Arthur Crisp-Recruitment Parade, New York (Verso) (CWM 19710261-0824).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Crisp-Recruitment Parade, New York (Verso) (CWM 19710261-0824).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Boyce passed away yesterday. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.134.216.72 (talk) 22:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu

Personal tools  

Namespaces