Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





SDSU-Prepper


Joined 15 July 2018
 


User page  

Talk  



Watch  

View history  

Contributions  

Edit  


 

Languages  

What links here  

User logs  

View user groups  

Permanent link  

Page information  

Edit full page  

Download QR code  





Latest comment: 5 years ago by Alex Shih in topic August 2018
 


  • 2 Archives
  • 3 Survivalism
  • 4 Neutrality
  • 5 Antifa
  • 6 August 2018
  • Welcome to SDSU-Prepper Talk Page

    edit

    The namesake is from my alma matter where I earned a bachelor of science degree and a bachelor of arts degree. I'm an entrepreneur who enjoys politics and preparedness. SDSU-Prepper (talk) 20:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    If you would like to start a conversation, please title a new section with the name of the Wikipedia page. SDSU-Prepper (talk) 12:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Archives

    edit

    I've archived content to clear my talk space. If you have any questions, please review User talk:SDSU-Prepper/Archives 1 [1] Thank you! SDSU-Prepper (talk) 20:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Survivalism

    edit

    Dear User talk:199.119.235.176 It was not a typo:

    Let me know if you have any questions. SDSU-Prepper (talk) 21:49, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Neutrality

    edit

    I favor neutrality! As a reminder:

    WP:PA

    WP:BULLY

    WP:POV railroad

    WP:Civility

    SDSU-Prepper (talk) 12:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Antifa

    edit

    I reverted your edit (again) since, wittingly or not, you stuck the "domestic terrorism" thing back in. If you were trying to make the Newsweek article verify that, well, on that topic that article verifies only that Sessions categorized the right-wing violence in Charlottesville as domestic terrorism. One could call that ironic. Drmies (talk) 04:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Dear Drmies, Someone keeps erasing the citation. Here you go. I will insert it. https://www.newsweek.com/are-antifa-terrorists-658396 2601:647:200:A396:7448:E5DD:7D95:CBC7 (talk) 04:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

      There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Drmies (talk) 04:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Would you please explain what this means? I believe there is a three revert rule, which you've violated. I've been working hard to gain consensus. Today I noticed that someone added a bit about domestic terrorism and it just so happened that I was researching with the Department of Homeland Security. I am an American concerned that foreign actors are trying to infiltrate our election system. It's not just Russia, but it's China, the U.K., etc.

    SDSU-Prepper (talk) 04:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Dear Drmies, Please refrain from: WP:PA -- Personal attack that my work and user talk is "barely intelligible"

    WP:BULLY -- false accusations, POV railroading, wiki hounding,

    WP:POV railroad -- policy misuse, pile-ons, incivility

    WP:Civility -- always trying to riducle my comments.

    These are your three reverts in direct succession, which is edit warring:

    1 (cur | prev) 04:10, 11 August 2018‎ Drmies (talk | contribs)‎ . . (48,042 bytes) (-100)‎ . . (Reverted to revision 854407975 by Newimpartial (talk): No, the BBC ref doesn's say that at all. (TW)) (Tag: Undo)

    2 (cur | prev) 04:13, 11 August 2018‎ Drmies (talk | contribs)‎ . . (48,042 bytes) (-100)‎ . . (Reverted to revision 854409096 by Drmies (talk): No, you also reinstated, without verification, the "domestic terrorism" ruse. be more careful please. (TW)) (Tag: Undo) (cur | prev) 04:12, 11 August 2018‎

    3 (cur | prev) 04:28, 11 August 2018‎ Drmies (talk | contribs)‎ . . (48,042 bytes) (-100)‎ . . (Reverted 1 edit by 154thTN Pvt. Seth Adam: Last time for me. need an admin to look at this in the light of DS. again: the BBC ref (or the misplaced Newsweek ref) IN NO WAY support this. (TW)) (Tag: Undo)

    SDSU-Prepper (talk) 07:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    August 2018

    edit
     

    You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

    You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

    If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Joe (talk) 07:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    This accusation is entirely false and excuse: I was not making a legal threat: I was discussing antifa and the Department of Homeland Security: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/8-17-metrics.pdf SDSU-Prepper (talk) 07:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Do not make legal threats on Wikipedia. A legal threat, in this context, is a threat to engage in an external (real life) legal or other governmental process that would target other editors.
    "Let's also invite The Department of Homeland Security to investigate the contributors of the page!" Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    https://fox40.com/2017/09/01/department-of-homeland-security-fbi-consider-antifas-activities-as-domestic-terrorist-violence/ https://www.theepochtimes.com/antifa-extremists-listed-as-domestic-terrorists-in-confidential-fbi-dhs-documents_2290447.html There are many more sources http://redalertpolitics.com/2017/07/03/new-jerseys-homeland-security-office-declares-antifa-a-terrorist-group/ https://www.opslens.com/2017/09/01/fbi-homeland-security-call-antifa-domestic-terrorists-warn-future-attacks/ https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2018/apr/10/dhss-antifa-neonazi-CA-rundown/ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/antifa-domestic-terrorists-us-security-agencies-homeland-security-fbi-a7927881.html SDSU-Prepper (talk) 08:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


    https://www.dhs.gov/how-do-i/report-suspicious-activity


    SDSU-Prepper (talk) 08:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


    NOTICE TO JOE: "Rather than immediately blocking users who post apparent threats, administrators should first seek to clarify the user's intention if there is doubt. Blocking for legal threats is generally not such an urgent need that it must be done before determining whether an ambiguous statement was genuinely a threat of legal action."

    Perceived legal threat. Rather than immediately blocking users who post apparent threats, administrators should first seek to clarify the user's intention, if there is any doubt.


    No one seeked to clarify with me. I never posted a legal threat. References to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) were in context of antifa. https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/anarchist-extremists-antifa SDSU-Prepper (talk) 08:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


    SDSU-Prepper (talk) 08:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


     
    This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

    SDSU-Prepper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


    Request reason:

    No one seeked to clarify with me. My understanding is that rather than immediately blocking users who post apparent threats, administrators should first seek to clarify the user's intention if there is doubt. I never posted a legal threat. References to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) were in context of antifa. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/8-17-metrics.pdf https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/anarchist-extremists-antifa.SDSU-Prepper (talk) 08:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Decline reason:

    Your call for DHS to investigate users ("Let's also invite The Department of Homeland Security to investigate the contributors of the page!") is a legal threat. You will need to withdraw this in order to be unblocked. I am declining this request. I'm also concerned you are WP:NOTHERE. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


    If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


    https://web.archive.org/web/20180811090055/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SDSU-Prepper SDSU-Prepper (talk) 09:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


    I have recorded this and it seems to disappear. No worries as I have archived the data at the link below:

     
    This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

    SDSU-Prepper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


    Request reason:

    No one seeked to clarify with me. My understanding is that rather than immediately blocking users who post apparent threats, administrators should first seek to clarify the user's intention if there is doubt. Blocking for legal threats is generally not such an urgent need that it must be done before determining whether an ambiguous statement was genuinely a threat of legal action. I never posted a legal threat. References to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) were in context of antifa and using DHS as a resource, for example: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/8-17-metrics.pdf I would submit that I am concerned about foreign agents meddling in our election and politics. It's not just Russia, but China, Germany, and even Scandinavia and the UK. It wouldn't be difficult for the DHS to use an IP address to identify (you know, if you see something you should say something?). I am in close proximity with the antifa community and as an American, I feel that it's dangerous for foreign actors to infiltrate the tapestry of our political landscape. Have fun storming the castle! SDSU-Prepper (talk) 09:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Decline reason:

    Of all the things that has been explained to you, you have managed to listen to nothing. Your intention is quite clear, so let me add another reminder: Wikipedia is not a soapbox. As you are being disruptive with your unblock requests, your talk page access has been revoked. You will have to appeal through Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System for your next request. Alex Shih (talk) 09:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


    If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20180811090055/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SDSU-Prepper SDSU-Prepper (talk) 09:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Have fun storming the castle! WP:BULLY WP:POV railroad You can't change history. SDSU-Prepper (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

    1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SDSU-Prepper/Archive_1

    Add topic

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SDSU-Prepper&oldid=1042495089"
     



    Last edited on 5 September 2021, at 08:14  


    Languages

     



    This page is not available in other languages.
     

    Wikipedia


    This page was last edited on 5 September 2021, at 08:14 (UTC).

    Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Terms of Use

    Desktop