This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (August 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
-yllion (pronounced /aɪljən/)[1] is a proposal from Donald Knuth for the terminology and symbols of an alternate decimal superbase[clarification needed] system. In it, he adapts the familiar English terms for large numbers to provide a systematic set of names for much larger numbers. In addition to providing an extended range, -yllion also dodges the long and short scale ambiguity of -illion.
Knuth's digit grouping is exponential instead of linear; each division doubles the number of digits handled, whereas the familiar system only adds three or six more. His system is basically the same as one of the ancient and now-unused Chinese numeral systems, in which units stand for 104, 108, 1016, 1032, ..., 102n, and so on (with an exception that the -yllion proposal does not use a word for thousand which the original Chinese numeral system has). Today the corresponding Chinese characters are used for 104, 108, 1012, 1016, and so on.
This article should specify the language of its non-English content, using {{lang}}, {{transliteration}} for transliterated languages, and {{IPA}} for phonetic transcriptions, with an appropriate ISO 639 code. Wikipedia's multilingual support templates may also be used. See why. (September 2021)
|
In Knuth's -yllion proposal:
Each new number name is the square of the previous one — therefore, each new name covers twice as many digits. Knuth continues borrowing the traditional names changing "illion" to "yllion" on each one. Abstractly, then, "one n-yllion" is . "One trigintyllion" ( ) would have 232 + 1, or 42;9496,7297, or nearly forty-three myllion (4300 million) digits (by contrast, a conventional "trigintillion" has merely 94 digits — not even a hundred, let alone a thousand million, and still 7 digits short of a googol). Better yet, "one centyllion" ( ) would have 2102 + 1, or 507,0602;4009,1291:7605,9868;1282,1505, or about 1/20 of a tryllion digits, whereas a conventional "centillion" has only 304 digits.
The corresponding Chinese "long scale" numerals are given, with the traditional form listed before the simplified form. Same numerals are used in the Chinese "short scale" (new number name every power of 10 after 1000 (or 103+n)), "myriad scale" (new number name every 104n), and "mid scale" (new number name every 108n). Today these numerals are still in use, but are used in their "myriad scale" values, which is also used in Japanese and in Korean. For a more extensive table, see Myriad system.
Value | Name | Notation | Standard English name (short scale) | Chinese ("long scale") | Pīnyīn (Mandarin) | Jyutping (Cantonese) | Pe̍h-ōe-jī (Hokkien) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 | One | 1 | One | 一 | yī | jat1 | it/chit |
101 | Ten | 10 | Ten | 十 | shí | sap6 | si̍p/cha̍p |
102 | One hundred | 100 | One hundred | 百 | bǎi | baak3 | pah |
103 | Ten hundred | 1000 | One thousand | 千 | qiān | cin1 | chhian |
104 | One myriad | 1,0000 | Ten thousand | 萬, 万 | wàn | maan6 | bān |
105 | Ten myriad | 10,0000 | One hundred thousand | 十萬, 十万 | shíwàn | sap6 maan6 | si̍p/cha̍p bān |
106 | One hundred myriad | 100,0000 | One million | 百萬, 百万 | bǎiwàn | baak3 maan6 | pah bān |
107 | Ten hundred myriad | 1000,0000 | Ten million | 千萬, 千万 | qiānwàn | cin1 maan6 | chhian bān |
108 | One myllion | 1;0000,0000 | One hundred million | 億, 亿 | yì | jik1 | ek |
109 | Ten myllion | 10;0000,0000 | One billion | 十億, 十亿 | shíyì | sap6 jik1 | si̍p/cha̍p ek |
1012 | One myriad myllion | 1,0000;0000,0000 | One trillion | 萬億, 万亿 | wànyì | maan6 jik1 | bān ek |
1016 | One byllion | 1:0000,0000;0000,0000 | Ten quadrillion | 兆 | zhào | siu6 | tiāu |
1024 | One myllion byllion | 1;0000,0000:0000,0000;0000,0000 | One septillion | 億兆, 亿兆 | yìzhào | jik1 siu6 | ek tiāu |
1032 | One tryllion | 1'0000,0000;0000,0000:0000,0000;0000,0000 | One hundred nonillion | 京 | jīng | ging1 | kiaⁿ |
1064 | One quadryllion | Ten vigintillion | 垓 | gāi | goi1 | kai | |
10128 | One quintyllion | One hundred unquadragintillion | 秭 | zǐ | zi2 | chi | |
10256 | One sextyllion | Ten quattuoroctogintillion | 穰 | ráng | joeng4 | liōng | |
10512 | One septyllion | One hundred novensexagintacentillion | 溝, 沟 | gōu | kau1 | kau | |
101024 | One octyllion | Ten quadragintatrecentillion | 澗, 涧 | jiàn | gaan3 | kán | |
102048 | One nonyllion | One hundred unoctogintasescentillion | 正 | zhēng | zing3 | chiàⁿ | |
104096 | One decyllion | Ten milliquattuorsexagintatrecentillion | 載, 载 | zài | zoi3 | chài |
In order to construct names of the form n-yllion for large values of n, Knuth appends the prefix "latin-" to the name of n without spaces and uses that as the prefix for n. For example, the number "latintwohundredyllion" corresponds to n = 200, and hence to the number .
To refer to small quantities with this system, the suffix -th is used.
For instance, is a myriadth. is a vigintyllionth.
Knuth's system wouldn't be implemented well in Polish due to some numerals having -ylion suffix in basic forms due to rule of Polish language, which changes syllables -ti-, -ri-, -ci- into -ty-, -ry-, -cy- in adapted loanwoards, present in all thousands powers from trillion upwards, e.g. trylionastrillion, kwadrylionasquadrillion, kwintylionasquintillion etc. (nonilionasnonnillion is only exception, but also not always[2]), which creates system from 1032 upwards invalid.