Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.





Article  

Talk  



Language  

Watch  

Edit  





J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that peremptory challenges based solely on a prospective juror's sex are unconstitutional.[1] J.E.B. extended the court's existing precedent in Batson v. Kentucky (1986), which found race-based peremptory challenges in criminal trials unconstitutional,[2] and Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company (1991), which extended that principle to civil trials.[3] As in Batson, the court found that sex-based challenges violate the Equal Protection Clause.

J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.
Argued November 2, 1993
Decided April 19, 1994
Full case nameJ. E. B., Petitioner v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.
Citations511 U.S. 127 (more)

114 S.Ct. 1419; 128 L. Ed. 2d 89; 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3121; 62 USLW 4219; 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) ¶ 42,967

Case history
PriorCertiorari to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals 606 So.2d 156
Holding
Intentional discrimination on the basis of gender by state actors in the use of peremptory strikes in jury selection violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
Harry Blackmun · John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Case opinions
MajorityBlackmun, joined by Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg
ConcurrenceO'Connor
ConcurrenceKennedy
DissentRehnquist
DissentScalia, joined by Rehnquist, Thomas
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Background

edit

On behalf of T.B., the mother of a minor child, the state sued J.E.B. for child supportinJackson County, Alabama. During jury selection, challenges intentionally targeted male potential jurors resulting in an all-female jury.

Decision

edit

The majority opinion was written by Justice Blackmun. Justice O'Connor wrote a concurring opinion, and Justice Kennedy separately concurred in the judgment. Chief Justice Rehnquist filed a separate dissenting opinion. Justice Scalia also filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice Thomas.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994).
  • ^ Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).
  • ^ Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., 500 U.S. 614 (1991).
  • Further reading

    edit
    edit


  • t
  • e

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J.E.B._v._Alabama_ex_rel._T.B.&oldid=1222973175"
     



    Last edited on 9 May 2024, at 02:21  





    Languages

     



    This page is not available in other languages.
     

    Wikipedia


    This page was last edited on 9 May 2024, at 02:21 (UTC).

    Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Terms of Use

    Desktop