This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago9 comments6 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 22 days ago13 comments6 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Space question: For + + (EP), there is currently a space between the two "+" symbols. But there is no space on the EP's cover art. Do sources usually include a space? — BarrelProof (talk) 09:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Korean music labels are characteristically consistent and stringent with their titings, even in those cases where it appears to be at odds with the album artwork. As a counterexample, Belle and Sebastian will varyingly style their group name as having either an ampersand or the word 'the' on their albums, and various music stores, music label listings, official websites, etc. will vary from either & or 'the' without always having the best rhyme or reason. Korean labels tend to be stricter – even though there is no space on the artwork for [+ +], you will be hard-pressed to find an online listing or official source otherwise that doesn't include a space. As far as how fans refer to it, there is probably a preference to type out ++ in informal conversation as it's quicker, but (as a barometer rather than strict metric) fan wikis will typically ensure the space is there. --AVNOJ1989 (talk) 01:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Leaning oppose or (Hash) for Hash (EP). The title [#] is not available. Wikipedia generally avoids adding characters that are merely decorative, and I think the current title is a reasonable approach without trying to add a distorted version of the brackets – using (Hash) wouldn't be using the correct type of brackets anyway. On the other hand, if we move the others then I can see the argument for using (Hash) for consistency with the others. Using the word "Hash" rather than than the symbol seems very similar to the approach used for both Back and Forth (film) and "Number 9 Dream" – both of those convert the unavailable symbol to a word. For those as well as the other articles mentioned, namely ♯P and "Rainy Day Women ♯12 &35", I notice that you covered up the actual article titles, and I don't think you should have done that. For purposes of this discussion, we need to see what those titles are in order to discuss them. The article at ♯P says it is pronounced "Sharp P", so for that one it seems OK that the first character is a sharp symbol, and that is not an analogous case. For "Rainy Day Women ♯12 &35", I have opened an RM at Talk:Rainy Day Women ♯12 & 35#Requested move 28 May 2024 that proposes renaming that article to avoid using the sharp symbol. As far as I can tell, that article has never had an RM discussion. — BarrelProof (talk) 09:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well, yes, sorry if that came across as confusing or condescending. The comment was for the benefit of others (and posterity) – not you. — BarrelProof (talk) 23:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Since this RM has had very low turnout, I may as well add my thoughts. It seems reasonable to me to approximate [ ] with ( ). By the way, I checked Apple Music and it lists [12:00] and [X X] as albums, not EPs – what's that all about? Toadspike[Talk]03:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support. These are the official name of the albums and have been consistently named this across a number of resources rather than some elective stylized names which won't be maintained in the future, and I have not seen fans come up with alternate names for them (if they have, they haven't used those names consistently). For (+ +), examples in WP:NCTR seem to allow for either + + or (+ +), but I would suggest (+ +) makes more sense, in line with what is proposed. Nearly the exact same rationale for (12:00) and (&). The question, really, is what to do with [#]? Officially, both 'Hash' and 'Sharp' have been used to refer to the album [1], and if you read through user comments at the bottom of this fan wiki [2], there is not a clear 'winner', but 'Hash' seems to win out. AVNOJ1989 (talk) 01:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
