![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Looking at both Khan Yunis massacre and Rafah massacre shows very few reliable historian sources that report on these events and, at least on Rafah, there's too much weight for one hearsay-based (read: "filled with distortion, bias and hyperbole."[1]), cartoon book done 50 years after the fact. Please list down sources below so we can establish notability.
It is hearsay from 50 years after the fact.
His desperate characters - fugitives, widows and sheiks - mix long past fact with fiction. "What I show in the book is that this massacre is just one element of Palestinian history ... and that people are confused about which event, what year they are talking about," he said. - [6]
Not even sure these sources merit an article. But let's assume they do, it is not this article. Whatever content is deemed worthwhile, should be merged into a larger article. -- MarciulionisHOF (talk) 10:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Half of discussion, many repeated points, is going on here. Kingsindian (talk) 12:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
There is a discussion going on about this at WP:RSN. Since the editor is new, I will make allowances and add this here myself. Kingsindian ♝♚ 18:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
While there's some argument that my post was imbalanced. I do believe there's a consensus that this source should not be used in the voice of history. I argue that an overly heavy use, even with citation, is unbalanced. Please let me know your view and reasons in favor of using this source heavily (if there are no other suggestions, I will move it to a new section titled 'Testimonies published in 2009' adding proper citation and a couple minimal 'disputed' sentences. MarciulionisHOF (talk) 19:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
There should be a distinguish template to separate this article from the Rafah massacre (2024) article. Bisexual Antifa Terrorist (talk) 16:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply