![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Doesn't the AEC put up party HTVs on the AEC website normally? I can't seem to find it. Timeshift (talk) 23:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
It's almost a status quo result - and the result is not final. We are not a media organisation and we should avoid editorialising over an insignificant swing. Once the result is final, I will add to the end of Terri Butler, "retained the seat with 51.7 percent (−1.3) (etc) of the two-party vote". This will say it all without taking a side - as the results table already does. As for the loser conceding days after, it's overblown and unneeded when Antony calls it only two hours after polls close. I suggest the IP talks rather than wars with a disputed change to the status quo. Timeshift (talk) 01:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also, Terri Butler has retained the seat, there is no need to wait for an official declaration before we state this. It's universally accepted throughout the political commentariat since election night that Labor retained the seat - apart from the LNP who for some reason waited a few days before conceding. Timeshift (talk) 04:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Griffith by-election, 2014. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
The infobox only includes 2 parties, and even then, only one gets an image. Sure, we can say who the winner was, but the infobox doesn't even say that the other 9 candidates have been omitted − it gives the impression that they didn't even exist.
I'd like to bring this page in line with the Wikipedia-wide guidelines for a neutral point of view: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Candidates_and_elections#Bias_in_summaries_and_infoboxes Owen214 (talk) 01:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply