This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AACS encryption key controversy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about AACS encryption key controversy. Any such comments may be removedorrefactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about AACS encryption key controversy at the Reference desk. |
![]() | AACS encryption key controversy has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Based on the fact that everything in this article is several years old, yet the articles speaks as if the issue is unresolved, I feel justified in tagging this with an "out of date" tag. 2600:1015:B12D:92A6:C9C:92FF:5A72:BDA3 (talk) 06:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 13256278887989457651018865901401704640. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#13256278887989457651018865901401704640 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. O.N.R. (talk) 10:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply