 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The use of national flags in the infobox is contrary to guidelines/policy/MOS. For one thing in this case, if any national flag were to be present it might be that of the Ottoman Empire, not the modern Syrian state; and "Syria" in the pre-WWI conceptualization also included Lebanon/Israel-Palestine and Jordan; and the modern flag is for a decidedly Islamic/Arab state and has little connection to the Christian exiles of the Syriac and Catholic churches....Skookum1 (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
The Arabs of Chile almost all trace their ancestry to immigrants form the early years of the 20th century. They are overwhelmingly Chiristians who immigrated to Chile before the modern national identities of Lebanese, palestinian and Syrian were invented. Once in Chile, they all married one another, and, of course, other Chilean Christians. It makes sense to treat them as a group. Historicist (talk) 22:55, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
A properly -sourced number would be useful. Unsourced guesses are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Blogs are not proper sources.Historicist (talk) 11:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
The Palestinian Chileans are so many that when spaeking about Arab-Chileans 90% of them must be Palestinians, and therefore should Palestinian-Chilean have their own article. when enought information is gathered about Syrian Chileans and other Arab-Chilean groups they should get their own article. To identify people as Arab-Chilean and British-Chilean seems to be a wikipedia invention. Dentren | Talk 11:27, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Arab Chileans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi! Spurred by the copy-edit drive of september 2022 I am working on this article which seems to have had many contributors, leading to problems of structure, scope and style. In particular the subsection that I have named CorpGroup is long-winded, poorly sourced, machine-translated, incomprehensible and out-dated. I particularly liked the translation of Bolsa (Stock Exchange) to "bag". Anyway, I propose to cut it down to a size fitting the purpose and scope of the article instead of copy-editing and updating the whole lot. Maybe nobody will read this anytime soon, but just in case, I´ll leave the article as is for a few days to see if I get comments or suggestions and then just carry out the plan and apply scissors. And I´ll leave this comment on the talk page so future readers understand what happened. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 02:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
