![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is not a merge proposal, but just a question: Would the content on this page be better off if it were to be merged with the MH-6 Little Bird page? They seem to be the same basic airframe, and the MELB is certainly based on the MH-6M. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Alan. From what I can tell, the lastest MH-6M that is covered in the MH--6 aritcle is based on the MD 530, and the MELB is besed on voth of them. It's on that basis that I thought it might be best to merge this article to the MH-6 page. - BillCJ (talk) 18:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Of course, the ULB/MELB is a Boeing product, as is the new AH-6 offering, Keeping the Boeing products here might make the best sense. - BillCJ (talk) 19:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Boeing is calling its current AH-6 product for ARH "AH-6S Phoenix". They have an Apache "lite" offering. See Boeing Offers Army Two ARH Alternatives (Av Week) and Boeing's new Phoenix rises from ARH ashes (FI) for more info. Also, the version offered foe export last fall is the AH-6I. The AH-6S is going to be stretched and improved with AH-64 Block III hardware and systems. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
This article is about variants of the AH-6, not the AH-6 itself. I think it should be under a title that reflects that, but I'm unsure which title to use. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 18:14, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
...and start to think. An already only theoretically "payload" - the diff between MTOW and empty weight is not usable - first roughly doubled, then increased by factor 10 ?? Factors higher then the MTOW ? Obviously a typo. Or if you can't understand figures: compare Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion, Boeing CH-47 Chinook: does it look like this?
Ironically this heli is even called "Little Bird": Do you have a glue what 25,000 lb payload means? Quite "Big Bird".
If you are not able to see, the formal Wikipedia rules: Your source is disputed. Tagremover (talk) 09:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\barmy-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
AH-6 Little Bird redirects here. Most people looking for data on the AH-6 are probably looking for information on the development and operational use of the AH-6 by 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment. That information is all on the MH-6 page. There's a mention of the AH-6 MELB here, but nothing to explain that Mission Enhanced Little Bird was a common programme across AH-6 and MH-6 and that AH-6M and MH-6M are now in operational service. That information is on the MH-6 page. This page is great for the Unmanned Little Bird, but it really doesn't cover the AH-6. Recommendation: rename this to Unmanned Little Bird, move all AH-6 related content to the MH-6 article, ensure AH-6 and AH-6 Little Bird redirect there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.122.84 (talk) 14:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Boeing AH-6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Boeing AH-6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply