| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bronchus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think merging the articles would be appropriate.--Jfurr1981 21:39, 5 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
Whoever put that "numbered" picture up, please put the key for the numbers as well... At least in the picture's page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.80.123.34 (talk) 08:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
This article suggests that the cartilaginous rings in the trachea are complete, surely this is incorrect?
--Sulleh (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Needless fragmentation. Content is duplicated and Bronchus would benefit from this added material. Iztwoz (talk) 20:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
DoneNeedless fragmentation, and repetition. Bronchus would be the better for added content. Iztwoz (talk) 20:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
DoneNeedless fragmentation - material already covered on Bronchus page Iztwoz (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
DoneSmall subtopic of Bronchus - material already duplicated there Iztwoz (talk) 20:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Done
