This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Brighterorange: I'm interested to know your thoughts on the Canadian Unitarian Council article. In Sept 2005, you tagged it for {{cleanup}}, with a comment of "yikes". But there's no comments in the Discussion page about what specifically should be cleaned up. What caught your eye?
Well, what bothered me about the article is that it mainly consists of large quoted texts "reproduced with permission." An encyclopedia article should be written from a neutral point of view (and thus not say things like "... our religious faith..."). Also, it has almost no wiki links. That's what I had in mind; sorry for not being more specific when I added the tag. Brighterorange17:09, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Anyone want to venture flushing out the "Relationship to the UUA" section? I'm not equipped to explain the reasoning behind this restructuring. As an encyclopaedic entry this information is glaringly absent.
JJ Bosch (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
