● Home ● Random ● Nearby ● Log in ● Settings ● Donate ● About Wikipedia ● Disclaimers

Talk:Cherry picking

● Article ● Talk ● Language ● Watch ● Edit Latest comment: 27 days ago by Hob Gadling in topic Falsification is NOT cherry picking Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cherry picking article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.

New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Assume good faith

Be polite and avoid personal attacks

Be welcoming to newcomers

Seek dispute resolution if needed

Article policies

Neutral point of view

No original research

Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the One-sided argument page were merged into Cherry picking. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Archives (Index)
2013 2015 2016 2017
This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Falsification is NOT cherry picking

edit

Latest comment: 27 days ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Somebody should pay attention to this page and state things clearly, because facts contrary to a theory that falsifies it can be labelled 'cherry picking' (ignoring the facts that are not opposed to the theory). Of course, falsification is very valid and not 'cherry picking'. Cherry picking is a fallacy only when applied in support of a theory, not against it.

Otherwise, theories could never be falsified, because any fact against them would be 'cherry picking'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.119.29.102 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article does not contain the words "falsify" or "falsification". It was like that in January 2020 too. What are you referring to? --Hob Gadling (talk) 18:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't need to contain those words. Falsifications are a subset of the entire evidence available and as such, they can be labelled as 'cherry picks' and 'science denial'. 2A02:2F08:ED1A:1500:8DB0:8791:2B57:BF62 (talk) 12:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I repeat: What are you referring to?

If there is something wrong with the article, say clearly what it is. If you want to change something, say clearly what it is. --Hob Gadling (talk) 12:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cherry picking in Science

edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't think it's helpful only giving the most extreme examples of cherry-picking data (i.e. Climate change, creationism, tobacco smoking). Cherry-picking, P-hacking, HARKing, data dredging is something that happens all the time in mainstream science. It isn't limited to people with extreme or unscientific opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.96.92 (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

If you have reliably sourced examples, please give them. If not, there is nothing we can do. --Hob Gadling (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cherry picking in software development

edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In IT cherry picking refers to merging particular changes down from a Development to the Main branch. Due to incomplete merges of dependent changes, this can result to software bugs. Atlassian even has a feature Cherry Pick for Bitbucket: https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/cherry-pick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.135.51.253 (talk) 15:50, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cherry_picking&oldid=1228473001" Last edited on 11 June 2024, at 12:27

Languages

This page is not available in other languages.

●This page was last edited on 11 June 2024, at 12:27 (UTC). ●Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted. ●Privacy policy ●About Wikipedia ●Disclaimers ●Contact Wikipedia ●Code of Conduct ●Developers ●Statistics ●Cookie statement ●Terms of Use ●Desktop