Talk:Churchdown

I've tried to get the "largest village" claim across in a NPOV:

• several villages make the same claim - Largest village in England
• the World Gazetteer reference documents the population of "Innsworth-Churchdown" - this page is about Churchdown, Innsworth has a separate page.
• the rest of the content on the page wasn't consistent with the claim. --Fontles 14:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The mark on the top of the mountain says, as I saw today, that the hill is not only 154 but 155 meter high.Flk-Brdrf (talk) 22:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Here the proof here - the Chosen Hill is 155 metres high]Flk-Brdrf (talk) 01:39, 19 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This circumstance is caused or at least "supported" by the fact that railway and motorway devide the village in 2 parts. Perhaps this is mention worth.Flk-Brdrf (talk) 11:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The size of the village is missing. I have no clue where I could find these data.Flk-Brdrf (talk) 03:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Churchdown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120802171523/http://www.gloucestershirewildlifetrust.co.uk/reserves/Chosen-Hilltohttp://www.gloucestershirewildlifetrust.co.uk/reserves/Chosen-Hill
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.libraries.gloucestershire.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=3596
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930202144/http://www.world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=1158312533&men=gpro&lng=en&dat=32&srt=npan&col=ahdq&geo=510785783tohttp://www.world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=1158312533&men=gpro&lng=en&dat=32&srt=npan&col=ahdq&geo=510785783

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Have a look to the German version of the aricle. It is significant better! How can this be? Come on Englishmen, show more partiotism ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flk-Brdrf (talk • contribs) 10:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply