This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cisco article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 100 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Under the controversies section I think we should mention the current lawsuits regarding caste based discrimination in the US?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.242.244.29 (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
IronPort was redirected to this article. There was a merge discussion with result: "REDIRECT. Material was already at the target article." However, this article is lacking essential information that the last revision of IronPort had: founders, founding date, headquarters, and some details about IronPort's products (search for keywords: AsyncOS, SpamCop). Also, this article still has links to IronPort that circle back to Cisco. In this state, reverting the redirect seems more reasonable. --Matthäus Wander (talk) 16:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply