| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Classical liberalism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 365 days  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is there really a source that describes Murray N. Rothbard as a classical liberal? 93.45.229.98 (talk) 06:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
What is the difference between CL and right-libertarianism? --95.24.66.215 (talk) 03:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Specifically the Vieira piece. The cited quote is taken out of context. It implies that classic liberalism is incompatible with "democratic" principles.
And yet, reading further down the cited article, we come across this: "We show that, unlike in Amartya Sen’s seminal contribution, classical liberal views of individual autonomy and freedom – as embodied in the harm principle – can provide consistent foundations for collective evaluations, and are consistent with the fundamental democratic principle of unanimity."
Proposed that the section be rewritten to more correctly reflect Vieira's views. Because, TBH, this looks like someone selectively quoted to make their point, while deliberately ignoring the rest of the article. Rumplestiltskin1992 (talk) 04:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
