![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org
|
WTF —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.5.236.90 (talk) 02:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Article states: "The commelinids are the only clade that the APG has informally named within the monocots." Surely that's completely incorrect as written? But I'm not sure what precisely it;s actually trying to say. All the other "top-level" taxons, as-were, aren't recognised as clades at present, pending being "reified"? 84.203.43.181 (talk) 23:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
The numbers in the cladogram, e.g. "monocots 131", need explanation. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 14:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply