Talk:Commitment to Development Index

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Commitment to Development Index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120113052646/http://dakis.fasid.or.jp/report/pdf/DP_1_E.pdftohttp://dakis.fasid.or.jp/report/pdf/DP_1_E.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050509171111/http://www.globalpolicyproject.org/indexComment.htmltohttp://www.globalpolicyproject.org/indexComment.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923093434/http://ausaid.gov.au/publications/pdf/cdi_appraisal.pdftohttp://www.ausaid.gov.au/publications/pdf/cdi_appraisal.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Effective Altruism § Commitment to Development Index 2021. Qzekrom (she/her • talk) 03:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Apollo468: I saw you adding the 2021 CDI scores - thank you! Please note that the individual component scores for the 2021 CDI are out of 100 and are displayed as percentages (e.g. 95%), whereas the overall scores are out of 100 and do not have percent signs. Also, can you please add the income-adjusted rankings too? Qzekrom (she/her • talk) 04:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry yeah, I'll do that. I wasn't sure if you wanted percents or out of 10 (like the previous, although I do think it is more neat.) Update:I changed it back to percents and finished main table, but income-adjusted might take a week or two since I'm more busy. Cheers, -- • Apollo468•  21:09, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply