| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Core stability article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article is a horrible mixture of pseudo-science, poorly written tutorials and presumably copy/pasted advice. I've removed some of the worst offenders, but I feel like the entire article needs a major overhaul. Would be nice if it didn't read like a self-help book. Nimlhûg (talk) 20:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
References are good, but in-line citations are better. It'd be nice to have citation tags on bits of information, as is I feel like adding {{fact}} tags to a couple sentences. WLU 17:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Since it's not effective (according to it's article)? But what about (Chinese) pole dancing? comp.arch (talk) 15:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Editors of this article might like to take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Core muscle training (2nd nomination) where a possible merge or at least redirect has been suggested. Siuenti (talk) 22:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
A similar page entitled Core Strengthening is in the midst of being published to Wiki as a college project. The table of contents for this page was used as a stepping stone for this and includes new topics to be discussed. Your suggestions and edits are welcome! Marilyn Narloch (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Marilyn NarlochReply
Hi, I think it would be a good idea to change the title to 'Core strength' on the basis that stability is only one aspect of strength. There is also core flexibility, for example, which could be a sub-section. Overall, I think this would give greater scope for the page to expand and would garner more interest among wikipedians. I believe core strength is also a more commonly used term than core stability in general. The 'Core stability' page would be redirected to 'Core strength'. Any fors or againsts?RickyBennison (talk) 10:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
