| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please not vis-a-vis the recent edit warring over a "controversy" section that I have blanked the section as a courtesy for now (without offering an opinion as to the validity of any of the information). The matter is currently under discussion at WP:BLP/N. Wikidemon (talk) 18:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
In the interest of full disclosure, I was the first to add any mention of controversy concerning Schmidly. My addition of this paragraph was in no way intended to bias the article, but rather to provide relevant and current information concerning the topic. In retrospect, however, adding this paragraph was inappropriate given my proximity to the subject and my strong personal opinion on the controversy surrounding him. For these reasons, I believe it important that I recuse myself from editing or providing my opinion on this article.
That said, allow me to quickly contradict my previous statement and say simply that something has to be done about this Controversies section. What began as a brief note about an on-going controversy surrounding Mr. Schmidly has since evolved into something of a tabloid article. It is well-sourced, but nonetheless reads as either a low-quality attempt at journalism or indeed an attempt to bias the article, if only due to its length relative to the rest of the article. I would suggest trimming down this section to provide only a brief mention of the circumstances surrounding his separation from OSU, the recent no-confidence vote by the UNM faculty, and the history behind this no-confidence vote (namely, accusations of cronyism). AmiDaniel (talk) 09:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on David J. Schmidly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on David J. Schmidly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
