This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There's an issue regarding the following: "Only the Latin grammarian Priscian is better attested to with such handwritten copies, with some 900 remaining extant." The number of extant New Testament manuscripts far exceeds 900. Is this assertion about Priscian meant to be confined to Classical Latin writers? If so, I think it should be indicated. Thoughts? --Clay Bahl (talk) 05:52, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
