This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deep-fried butter article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Deep-fried butter has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 3, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Deep-fried butter appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 May 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
|
Reviewing |
|
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 03:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
With the below modifications made, the article satisfies criteria on grammar as well as general layout/structure. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 06:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
No signs of original research. The article cites and makes frequent use of a decent-sized list of reputable sources. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
It seems the article covers all relevant aspects of its subject for which verifiable information can be readily obtained. None of the content comes off as non-essential. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
The article maintains a neutral tone throughout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Though I only looked as far back as May 2015, the article has been free of content wars/disputes. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:18, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
All images used in this article serve valid illustrative purposes. None of them violate fair use policies, as all are freely licensed. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Though I can't see myself getting in consuming proximity with the topic any time soon, I'm nonetheless pleased to say its article qualifies as a GA! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 06:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Just to check, this article states that a citation is needed for "significant buttery flavor". Given that the item consists of a stick of butter, coated with batter, is it really necessary to require a citation? I mean, it might just be me, but that seems rather obvious to suggest that butter tastes like butter. -E.J.P., 16/06/16 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.255.238.82 (talk) 05:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
who the hell would eat this BoyBeyondTheStars (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Since it is an unhealthy food, it should have health issues and problems on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4700:2D30:FDA1:E805:FB8:E9A7 (talk) 20:23, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply