This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The statement that fiddlehead ferns' status as a delicacy is confined to Canada is uncited and seems suspicious to me. I live in Massachusetts where these ferns are considered a special springtime treat. Many folks gather their own and they can also be found in local markets in season. Mr. Kalish (talk) 01:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I can't edit the article because Wikipedia is blocking the proxy I use; however, I'd suggest the following:
Agreed. There are many that aren't delicacies within their culture but rather staple food such as Ambuyat. I wouldn't even go so far as to call some of them acquired tastes, as that's a Western-centric way of viewing them. (Though some, like Hakarl, are acquired tastes even within their homelands) 148.4.201.116 (talk) 19:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'd add as well that the countries of supposed origin need not be included. For example, caviar is a delicacy anywhere, and while the most expensive kinds come from Iran many kinds that are still plenty enough expensive and rare come from other countries as well. 148.4.201.116 (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It seems to me that a number of these dishes are not "delicacies" inside of a particular culture, but are merely seen as unusual by outsiders. This seems like a conflation of meanings.--Pharos (talk) 17:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The term used for Australia’s aboriginal people is widely considered a slur. It could be changed, however, could it not just be reduced to Australia - seems odd that just this one is like this 49.179.79.51 (talk) 14:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Removing sections centred on individual delicacies
Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I support removal of two recently added sections [1] (Overview of Delicacy Consumption and The History of Various Delicacies), and a third, which I've deleted (Potential risks).
In all cases, the sections deal with only a select few delicacies, not the general topic of 'Delicacy'. As such, they are perhaps even original research, not relying on a secondary source to establish the notability of various narrowly focussed facts in relation to such a general article. Information on individual delicacies is best provided in their respective articles. My two cents. signed, Willondon (talk) 20:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support. The Subjectivity section is also... well, subjective, poorly-sourced, and should be deleted. The remainder of the article is just a subjective list with poor sources, WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Delicacy needs to be defined for the encyclopedia, but the article should be overhauled. Zefr (talk) 21:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think there are some valuable resources there, based on their description, but the presentation of the information is awkwardly phrased, and organized in a way that suggests original research. I think the Subjectivity section could be improved, instead of being deleted. Subjectivity is an inherent part of delicaciness: it's that a certain community finds it desirable. I agree with comments that pose the distinction between "delicacy" among a community and "exotic" to another. My three cents. signed, Willondon (talk) 00:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The section has been challenged since October 2017, and is a haphazard collection of mostly unsourced instances of supposed delicacies. To illuminate the article about delicacies, it provides no information on why they are considered delicacies, or any information relevant to the general topic. Perhaps in a list of delicacies article. signed, Willondon (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
