| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dinamalar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How did dinamalar.com attract 202,000 visitors[1] when dailythanthi.com (the market leader offline) could manage only 21,000 visitors[2] in 2008?Anwar (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
The user base of Dinamalar and Dinathanthi is vastly different. A tamilian looking for a Tamil Newspaper online would gravitate to Dinamalar rather than thanthi. It is like comparing the WSJ 8 million online vs 2 million physical and TOI 800 thousand online vs 4 million physical. The numbers here are from wiki and siteanalytics. கிருஷ்ணா/Krishna (talk) 10:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Wasifwasif:, the source you've got this time is pretty good, but it doesn't state anything about the motives for their publication of the cartoons. Please demonstrate some reliable sources that claim Dinmalar unequivocally published cartoons of Muhammad for reasons of provocation. Furthermore, please read WP:SAWW. The term "Islamic prophet" is to be used once per article. Please refrain from reinserting it multiple times. Dolescum (talk) 17:15, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
