This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fair game (Scientology) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photographbeincluded in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. | Upload |
![]() | On 20 December 2008, Fair game (Scientology) was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
![]() | On 6 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Fair Game (Scientology)toFair game (Scientology). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Hi,
This page quotes almost verbatum from this published article, without proper attribution. [1]
References
{{citation}}
: |contribution-url=
missing title (help)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Montrealguy123 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On the entry for Mark and Monique Rathburn under "Cases":
"As of January 2016, the court has denied a Church motion to have the case dismissed under anti-SLAPP law,[74] but the ruling Miscavage must testify in the case was overturned on appeal."
Miscavige is misspelled and the sentence structure is confusing. It should be corrected to:
"As of January 2016, the court has denied a Church motion to have the case dismissed under anti-SLAPP law,[74] but the ruling that Miscavige must testify in the case was overturned on appeal." 2601:280:CB01:3BB7:C88:5F2F:C83B:6B73 (talk) 20:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
but I can't do it myself. 14.201.77.210 (talk) 02:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Grorp I see you undid my revision where I categorized this page in Category:1950s establishments in the United States. I do understand why and I won't contest the decision, but I still think it would be good to put this page in a category based on the time that the practice was first started. What do you think about putting this in Category:1950s introductions?Doomhope (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply