 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The infobox at the top of the article lists LC-19 as the pad, but a chart near the end of the article lists LC-14. Which is accurate? Darry2385 01:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
-The Gemini was launched from 19. The Agena was from 14. The table is for the Agena. Fl295 18:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
The universe is a pretty radioactive place. Outside the friendly confines of Earth’s habitat, it is going to be an issue on space flights. I like to see us explain the experiments of Gemini 11 in more detail and perhaps tie them to the high altitude. In particular, I’m thinking of the experiments “1) synergistic effect of zero-g and radiation on white blood cells . . . (4) nuclear emulsions . . . (7) Gemini ion wake measurement.” And long can be good. Provided we still keep our article divided into sections so people can read what they’re interested in and skip (perhaps just for the time being) what they’re not so interested in, then longer and fuller explanations are often better for our readers. FriendlyRiverOtter 23:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gemini 11. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
