Talk:George Bornemissza

I am a little surprised that this article has only today been blacklisted with the suggestion that I, the author, have a close connection with the subject. The article has been on Wikipedia for almost a year with no problems, yet because there is controversy over another of my articles, this one comes under fire too. Could someone please explain what I would need to do to remove the "close connection" flag? Is there anything contentious about this article? Missylisa153 (talk) 21:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Paid_editing_%28policy%29

Prohibited activities

• An editor responds to a freelance jobs board posting to write and submit content on Wikipedia.Teapotgeorge^Talk 22:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

As you commented on my talk page, the policy on paid editing is as yet an unapproved proposal. Missylisa153 (talk) 08:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:COI#Financial is already established, however. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:13, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Bornemissza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080216072945/http://internt.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/perth/chalcidoids/index.dsmltohttp://www.eol.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I've copy edited this article to ensure a more neutral point of view as well as attempted to find more citations for some of the statements made in the article. I've also added the citation needed template where I think appropriate. After completing this work I've also gone ahead and removed the Conflict of Interest template. Ambrosia10 (talk) 19:47, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply