Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Talk:Glacier





Article  

Talk  



Language  

Watch  

Edit  


Latest comment: 1 year ago by Vsmith in topic No need for matter of fact language
 


Learn more about this page
Former good articleGlacier was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 27, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 20, 2005Good article nomineeListed
February 14, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): WendyCisneros.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 22:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

No need for matter of fact language

edit

Not only is anthropogenic climate change not a fact, it is not necessary to state it as one. In this case, a simple addition of “Climate scientists believe” or “It is thought” or “Increased co2 levels suggest” to the below listed entry solves the issue. This is not a debate or discussion about Climate Change, just the terms used when stating it. I would prefer someone edit it who worked on the article. Thank you. David

Under the CLIMATE CHANGE section;

“Human activity has caused an increase in greenhouse gases creating a global warming trend,[58] causing these valuable glaciers to melt.” WaveGuidedFunction (talk) 14:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry but, anthropogenic climate change has been quite well established as "fact" by the scientists working in the field. Yes, the oil company execs and their buddies are in denial about it - because they might lose a buck or two and $$$ is all they care about. Cheers, Vsmith (talk) 19:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Glacier&oldid=1194430351"
 



Last edited on 8 January 2024, at 23:52  


Languages

 



This page is not available in other languages.
 

Wikipedia


This page was last edited on 8 January 2024, at 23:52 (UTC).

Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Terms of Use

Desktop