| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photographbeincluded in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. | Upload |
re: this (now removed) Mitchell's journalistic credibility began being questioned in a...
What is this? a joke? Blogs do not generate news and encyclopedias are not the place to report "breaking news" for the first time. Find a credible source or zip it. Skywriter 23:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
With all due respect to those that raised the question, I do not think that there can now be any doubt regarding the notability of Greg Mitchell's contributions. His coverage of Wikileaks since the release of the diplomatic cables has contributed immensely to the the public discussion, and it has been a reliable and informative resource for many interested parties. It is easily comparable the Guardian Newspaper Wikileaks cables timeline. In addition, he has a book in press about the subject, which may be the first to press. Moreover, I do not think that Greg Mitchell's journalistic credentials could possibly be doubted. Let's put the notability question to rest.
Regards, proclus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proclus@gnu-darwin.org (talk • contribs) 03:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Added to Lead to reflect more of overall article; added standard headers; reorganized article as standard bio; added more cites on some material; added more context.Parkwells (talk) 22:03, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Greg Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
