Talk:Groombridge 34

I've just been looking through the information provided in the article about these Stars, but when I look at the external links listed as sources, the data doesn’t seem to match up. The article for instance only seems to be giving data for one of the pair, where it states that the Mass is 0.4 Solar masses and the size is 0.5 Solar radii. This in contradicted by the Solstation article [1] (which is listed as a source). That says that the first star has 0.486 Solar masses and 0.34 Solar radii, and that the second star is much smaller, at 0.163 Solar masses and 0.19 Solar radii. I looked through the other 3 pages listed as sources but couldn't find any figures provided for mass and radius, so I don't know where the current figures are coming from. I'm therefore going to place the Solstation info into the article (assuming I can work out these info boxes), as it has the data for both stars and seems to be more precise. --Hibernian (talk) 00:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

SolStation is a secondary source. It is better to track down the sources for the SolStation data and use those as references instead.—RJH (talk) 17:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Groombridge 34. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120513202710/http://www.chara.gsu.edu/RECONS/TOP100.posted.htmtohttp://www.chara.gsu.edu/RECONS/TOP100.posted.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply