| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G- do us a favor, if you are going to put up a self-promoting wikipedia entry and call yourself a writer link to something more substantive than a single page flash website.
Why was "United States-based (since 1978)" removed? He's been based in the U.S. practically all of his adult life; surely this merits mention. - Jmabel | Talk 00:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
The writing, particularly in its word choice ("legendary" being one of Gomez-Pena's favorite words for describing his own events), seems to suggest that big chunks of this were indeed written by Gomez-Pena. As someone currently slogging through a series of his writings, self-promotion seems locked in a struggle to the death with contradiction and banal identity politics. 89.247.91.45 (talk) 23:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've removed the following fragment of a citation that was floating around, long detached from whatever it cited for. Someone may want to work out what can be cited from this source.
| title = Gómez-Peña to Present 1999 Abramowitz Lecture | url = http://web.mit.edu/arts/about/news/extra/1999/1027_gomezpena.html\ | format = html | date = 1999-10-27 | accessdate = 2006-12-06
- Jmabel | Talk 20:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
The following was in the article as a citation; it is clearly not a citation. I've moved it here in case someone can re-integrate it appropriately.
{{cite web
Through his organization, La Pocha Nostra, Gómez-Peña has intensely focused on the notion of collaboration across national borders, race, gender and generations as an act of citizen diplomacy and as a means to create transnational communities of rebel artists. }}</ref>
I'd like to put forth a motion to remove the "Notability" tag from this article. This artist has had a TON of press over the years, and we now have a pretty wide variety of outside sources (and can easily get more). Clearly, the article still needs some work, but the notability problem really doesn't seem to be an issue. Any objections? MisterB777 (talk) 17:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
I agree that the article needs some work, but notability is not the issue. This is a very well known contemporary artist who has received international attention. I just removed the tag.--Arthistorygrrl (talk) 19:01, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Guillermo Gómez-Peña. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
