 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I removed these hajduks added by User:151.205.9.162, since they fail the google test.
How does he qualify as a haiduk? he was one of the leaders of an organised, national resistance movement with clear aims. He was a lawyer for God's sake! You might as easily say that George Washington was a haiduk since he too was a well educated commander of irregular troops, fighting against what he perceived were national opressors. Avram Iancu clearly does not qualify as a haiduk, i have heard this term describing only local guerrilas/bandits with a limited goal. Not a revolutionary leader! And also... I believe this article should not be linked to the WikiProjectSerbia since haiducs are part of the national myth of several other European countries. Serbia doesn't have a copyright on them. 89.35.62.12 (talk) 02:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hajduk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hajduk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hello,
Rewrite Hajduk to Haiduk.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/haiduk
Thank you Marino 08:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, my name is Losangelessloth and I also am here to propose and promote changing the erroneous spelling of the title of this Wikipedia Entry.
Specifically, from HajduktoHaiduk.
I have here five (5) sources which all contain a singular, uniform spelling of this word. All five (5) sources choose to spell the title of this Wikipedia entry as: haiduk.
[1] There is the spelling from Dictionary.com already sourced by Marino around a year ago. [1].
[2] Secondly, there is the spelling from Merriam-Webster.com (apparently a company/publisher since 1823) [2].
[3] Thirdly, Britannica.com agrees with the previous two sources' spelling [3].
[4] Fourthly, I have a less renowned source which most likely obtains their content from more well established publishers, but, nevertheless, still displays the consistency/uniformity apparent across all other sources. The reference is from: Collins.com [4].
[5] Lastly, a similar source (in terms of lack of prestige) to [4] is thefreedictionary.com -- which follows the same characteristic pattern of spelling the word in question as: Haiduk [5].
Would anyone wish to discuss what more is necessary to push a change in the title of the Wikipedia entry?
I feel as though this collection of references should be quite sufficient, no?
If not, what more is required so that such a change can be made un-contested?
Is it possible to change the title myself? I < 3 you.
Losangelessloth (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
References
