Talk:Here Technologies

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 04:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Here Technologies → HERE Technologies – HERE Technologies is always capitalizing the word "HERE". See the HERE website: https://www.here.com/company/about-us and social media channels > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/here Twitter: https://twitter.com/HERE LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/here CMLarek (talk) 16:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

— CMLarek (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Oppose, see WP:MOSTM for how to deal with stylized/all caps trademarks. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 17:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
• Oppose per MOS:TM, WP:TITLETM, MOS:ALLCAPS. (And the logo is lowercase.) — BarrelProof (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
• Opoose to justify such a move we would need evidence that the vast majority of reliable independent sources use the proposed spelling and so far that hasn’t happned.--70.27.244.104 (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
• Oppose move per MOS:TM and above. O.N.R. ^(talk) 15:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
• Oppose, see WP:MOSTM and SNOW CLOSE In ictu oculi (talk) 16:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 17:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Here Technologies → HERE Technologies – Per WP:CAPS, HERE Technologies is always capitalizing the word "HERE". See the HERE website: https://www.here.com/company/about 110.138.72.62 (talk) 06:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

• This does seem to be done by independent sources though the logo uses all lower case. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
• Oppose per last year's discussion. 162 etc. (talk) 16:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
• Oppose the move as proposed per WP:MOS-TM and WP:OFFICIAL. Dekimasuよ! 07:08, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requesting a consensus on merging Traffic.com into this article. Here is Traffic.com's successor after Nokia acquired its former parent, Navteq; typically in these situations there aren't separate articles. The Traffic.com article is also quite dated and lacks citations, and any notable history should be integrated into the Here Technologies article. MikeM2011 (talk) 19:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

• Comment - @GenQuest - was there a consensus to merge Traffic.com into Navteq instead? I didn't see any unless I'm looking in the wrong place. MikeM2011 (talk) 03:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • No, MikeM2011, didn't think it was necessary for that whole process. The corporate acquisition of Traffic.com was by Navteq, not HERE. The renaming to HERE was a rebranding, not a merger. Since the Traffic article was small, half fluff/clutter, generally uncited, and easy to clear from the queue, I jumped on it. Of course, you can reverse if you feel my reasoning is wrong. Regards, GenQuest ^"scribble" 03:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply