This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
It is requested that a photographbeincluded in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Vietnam may be able to help!
It is requested that a mapormapsbeincluded in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Vietnam may be able to help!
In the time chart at the head of the article, the Hoabinhian in classified as Mesolithic and given a date which differs from the date in the lead paragraph and from that given in the summary of the decisions of the most recent congress, which also ruled that Hoabinhian isn't Mesolithic. Can anyone reconcile these contradictions?
@Chaipau: Where does Tagore et al. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008685/ say Onge are 35% East Asian? Please provide source. Studies that came out this year also do not model Onge as mixed, but separate/very different group from Southeast/East Asians, Onge are also not closely related to Hoabianin. My problem is you claiming them as mixed when they are not, which is not even in source. 117.198.115.23 (talk) 22:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
