Talk:Howard Florey/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: STEMinfo (talk · contribs) 00:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):  

   b. (citations to reliable sources):  

   c. (OR):  

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):  

   b. (focused):  

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:  

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:  

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)