This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IRIS Sahand (1969) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships#Iranian frigate Sahand Some anons have added that the Iranian frigate Sahand, which was heavily damaged and sunk during Operation Praying Mantis, was raised and now one has cited Janes fighting ships 2006-2007. If anyone has access to a copy I'd like to get verification from an established editor (and a page number, ISBN, etc) to further confirm this. Further status beyond just "raised" would be nice as well. Was it raised to scrap, or because it presented a navigational hazard, etc. Thanks. --Dual Freq 11:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I don't have a copy of that Janes infront of me, and I woudlnt' mind betting that whoever is trying to further this misinformation - that the Sahand has been raised and only an anonymous Wikipedian has found out - doesn't either. As noted over on WP:SHIPS the source of this "claim" appears to be a petty slagging match at http://wikimapia.org/1773132/ Emoscopes Talk 20:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
As general observation, i think that could be important to remark how this class of frigate is the fastest of any other type of the category. Not even 'Lupo', that are 'only' rated at 35 knts.--Stefanomencarelli (talk) 22:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
This article has no accessible references. One is dead and the other is locked. Article cannot be regarded as reliable without accessible references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pheasantpete (talk • contribs) 22:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Ship was also hit by a Walleye weapon. Not sure why this isn’t mentioned?Brooksindy (talk) 00:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply