 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Institutional economics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
To quote Michael Carter, "Microeconomic analysis of institutions has found a secure place in the economics literature". [1].Olsson in 1999 made the case for institutional microeconomics. [2] I propose to add some material to link this over into the Engineering economics articles. Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 15:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
The article discusses how Hamilton set out the original concepts that defined Institutional economics in his 1919 paper on the subject.[3] Other than the reference in the lede, there is no other mention of Hamilton. I propose adding a paragraph on Hamilton before the material on John Commons who wrote about the topic in 1925. Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 14:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
References
"The concept of conspicuous consumption was in direct contradiction to the neoclassical view that capitalism was efficient." - Is there a reputable source for that? If conspicious consumption generates lots of utility for the consuming individual not attainable otherwise, what is inefficient about it? Bests, --Trinitrix (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
"Some institutionalists see Karl Marx as belonging to the institutionalist tradition, because he described capitalism as a historically-bounded social system; other institutionalist economists[who?] disagree with Marx's definition of capitalism, instead seeing defining features such as markets, money and the private ownership of production as indeed evolving over time, but as a result of the purposive actions of individuals." Continues to lack a source. Listing here for deletion if not provided over the next month. DocHeuh (talk) 17:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
