This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Israel lobby in the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 600 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 600 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Israel lobby in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
This edit [1] removing some material about a Christian lobby for Israel is a bit suspicious. Comments? Also, is Christians United for Israel really bigger than AIPAC?John Nagle (talk) 17:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Israel lobby in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I was doing some research and I noticed a quote was wrong. This part: "Mearsheimer and Walt have collected and quoted some of the lobbyists' comments on their organizations' political capital. For example, Mearsheimer and Walt quote Morris Amitay, former AIPAC director as saying, "It's almost politically suicidal ... for a member of Congress who wants to seek reelection to take any stand that might be interpreted as anti-policy of the conservative Israeli government."" That was not stated by Amitay, and the citation in Mearsheimer & Walt's book refers to this first article here (by Berger; interestingly, they cite it as Nov 8 instead of Nov 7...): http://pdfs.jta.org/2002/2002_11_07.pdf Actually, that "politically suicidal" quote is from... former president Jimmy Carter! Apparently. According to: https://archive.is/3pY0E#selection-772.0-772.1 It seems to be legit. :) 97.104.181.98 (talk) 23:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
why is the term "Palestinians' right of self-determination" used in one case and "Israel's very right to exist" in another ? it makes it sounds as though Israel's claim to statehood is more justifiable and opposing it more extreme than is the case with Palestine - along the lines of `they even reject Israel#s very right to exist" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.163.59 (talk) 12:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello.
The following seems like relevant information to add to this page. Is somebody here willing to do so please?
David A (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply