![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
im curious, on what grounds does rav gantzfried make his addition to the list, its not one of the 36 listed in the mishna (which someone should, btw post on here, I may if i get the time) thank you in advance g.j.g (talk) 01:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
On the grounds of the fate of Onan. Many try to dance away from the part that it "offended/disgusted" saying it was just the failure to do his levirite marriage duties, but they forget that it OFFENDED/DISGUSTED. So much that he was killed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.59.127 (talk) 10:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC) nobody denies the wrongness of imams actions, and I do not recall seeing somebody deny their nature, yet bad and liable to kareit are not synonymous, the Gemara has a list of the sins that make one liable to kareit and masturbation is not on that list, so I'd be curious where rav fantzfried makes this addition (exact source) , thank you in advance g.j.g (talk) 01:57, 12 December 2010 (UTC) On an unrelated manner, I'm now looking back at that last post and realizing how many spelling errors autocorrect made. imam should be Onan, and fantzfried should be Gantzfried g.j.g (talk) 02:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
This list has issues. Some things are not defined properly. The Kitzur (Rabbi Ganzfried) is not the originator of this, nor is this necessarily meant literally. Violation of the Sabbath should be mentioned, prohibited relations should be combined, and perhaps an addendum on intermarriage.Mzk1 (talk) 21:28, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Most English academic sources appear to use "cut off" or "cutting off" to discuss this, not karet/kareth. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:13, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Dear User:Lisa Please can you give grounds, stating relevant Wikipedia policies, as to why you have [deleted these WP:RS from the article?] In ictu oculi (talk) 04:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Best regards. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Based on In Ictu's poor presentation (cherry picking?) of sources supporting his attempted move of B'rov am hadrat melech (see the move request on the discussion page), I recommend that his presentation of sources here be taken with a grain of salt until someone else has had the time to check the sources independently with Google Book Search. - Lisa (talk - contribs) 17:05, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Reply