Talk:Kraków/GA2

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 12:54, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

My initial impressions, after skim-reading this article a couple of times, is that: it's comprehensive, wide-ranging and well referenced. I don't yet see anything obvious missing. So, it appears to be GA material.

I'm now going to be spending the next few days going through the article. I will be going through it section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Depending on what I find, I may only post corrective actions; but we will have a wait and see. Pyrotec (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A comprehesnsive, wide-ranging, well-referenced article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:  

   B. MoS compliance:  

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:  

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  

   C. No original research:  

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:  

   B. Focused:  

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:  

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:  

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  

   Well illustrated

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:  

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply