This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Maybe, yes. But had you considered that these so-called citations don't really support much, or in some cases any, article content? See my thread "List of the wax figures" above. Sorry to drone on about this, but nobody seems to care very much. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:01, 8 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
I see what you mean, perhaps the list as is could be moved to it's own list page and a smaller list of notable figures that are more easily kept control of and verified left here.
What do you think? Alduin2000 (talk) 16:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
I've gone ahead and done it. I've transferred tables from other pages for now but obviously there is no separate London page and other notable figures may be missing as of now. Alduin2000 (talk) 17:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago9 comments3 people in discussion
Hello, any watchers around?
I suggest we delete this part of the article. As the article states, there's no reasonable criteria. Odds are that anyone who has a waxfigure also has a WP-article. This is just WP:FANCRUFT, and can be handled with one or more categories instead. This info belongs on org websites.
