The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
on the same note, Following the outbreak of the Revolt of the Comuneros, could use a date for clarity ... sawyer * he/they * talk23:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
source check: all of the sources look excellent in terms of quality/reliability; published by academic publishers, etc. i'd love to see the sources listed in the further reading section used, but i won't ask you to learn Spanish for this project haha. i found Fink De Backer on google books, and spot-checked both it and Fleming 2018 - everything came up good! ... sawyer * he/they * talk05:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm actually fluent in Spanish. The reason I didn't use the books is because I don't have easy access to paginated copies; I have access to some as ebooks, but they lack page numbers; others I can only find in libraries hundreds of kilometres away. I could add info from the RAH source, but it would mostly be trivial additions, most of it is already in here. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
no issues with broadness or focus; all the major aspects of what i'd expect from a biography are there, and it doesn't go into too much obscure detail.
the article is neutral enough, discussing both the contemporary negative views of Pacheco and more modern reinterpretations of her legacy.
only just noticed this, because i hadn't looked too much at the infobox - the infobox gives her death location as Porto, and her resting place as Porto Cathedral, but this isn't mentioned in the body. that'd be a good thing to get sorted out. ... sawyer * he/they * talk19:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
where possible, i'd like to see dates & artists' names in the image captions, but that's more of an informal suggestion on my part than anything with the GA criteria. no issues with the images generally. ... sawyer * he/they * talk19:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
