Talk:NGC 2770

Interwiki has problem. All of them for number 2715 not 2770.

Seems to be resolved now. WilliamKF (talk) 20:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seems that the fourth reference's link isn't valid. http://www.gemini.edu/SN2008D -- 93.141.71.14 (talk) 22:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

How many stars are in the NGC 2770 galaxy? Dantescifi —Preceding undated comment added 00:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC).Reply

There's no way to know for certain, although the combined stellar mass of 21 billion times the mass of the Sun may give an indication. Praemonitus (talk) 16:57, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on NGC 2770. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gemini.edu/node/281
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725231212/http://medusa.as.arizona.edu/lbto/firstbinocularlight_press_release.htmtohttp://medusa.as.arizona.edu/lbto/firstbinocularlight_press_release.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply