Talk:Owler

History suggests Mgc5256 may have a conflict of interest. Removing the spam section was particularly suspicious. 2620:0:1000:1601:48EC:9A93:5902:46A5 (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

You do realize that Twitter is not a legitimate source, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgc5256 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

On the contrary, Wikipedia policy is that "A specific tweet may be useful as a self-published, primary source." See Twitter as a reliable source. The claim is that the company has been accused of spam on Twitter, and the links are to specific, concrete, documented allegations of spam on Twitter. 2620:0:1000:1601:48EC:9A93:5902:46A5 (talk) 04:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply