 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
I suggest this page be flagged as a stub. Not only is there MASSIVE amounts of information missing, the article doesnt even mention what they were created for & their need for the war.
This article is nothing but a listing of a few known locations, which is not near as important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:1003:C2EF:F81C:C57B:5759:6208 (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
In the article, the phrase "set of reinforced concrete caissons constructed by civil engineering contractors" contains a hyper link that is ambiguous. I would be happy to "bypass" the disambiguation page, by changing the link to one that goes directly to the correct destination; but first I would have to know (find out) which article is the correct destination page. (any advice?) Thanks, --Mike Schwartz (talk) 00:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
why were they "collected and sunk" in the UK? seems weird. before the invasion you mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Feldercarb (talk • contribs) 04:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Apologies but I'm just going to leave this here since I don't have time to edit... there's a link with more locations of Caissons extant in the UK. Current list in article is incomplete. https://historicengland.org.uk/whats-new/news/phoenix-caisson-in-kent-designated-part-of-the-mulberry-floating-harbour-used-in-the-d-day-landings/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silverneko (talk • contribs) 00:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
