![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translationofPisa from it.wikipedia. (26183844 et seq.) |
I can't believe that this page has been never discussed... There are two possibilities:
joking aparts, it is needed to determine which Niles is twinned with the city. --Attilios 21:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
There is no link for the Cathedral in Churches sectiion, which seems very strange. How about the Griffin displayed there in it's museum ?
Pisa is a city in Tuscany, central Italy, on the right bank of the mouth of the Arno River on the Ligurian Sea.
Isn't it on both banks of the Arno? Fph (talk) 13:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Doesn't Pisa originate from the ancient Greek city of Pisa (near Olympia) in Greece? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.131.8.16 (talk) 12:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
This is a fairly thorough article I would say. However, it lacks the usual apparatus - mainly the inline notes. For the prose - well, I've seen some of this somewhere else, but I can't say exactly where. The process of setting up the inline notes should uncover it. Pisa is pretty well covered on the Internet. Most of this is presented I am sure by the Italian article. We aren't Italian. It needs to be verifiable in English. For the content, once the archaeologists were clued to the presence of the Etruscans they went to work in Pisa so there is more to be said of them. I suggest a prehistory section.Dave (talk) 11:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
PS. I just noticed - the external links are mainly advertising. I really don't know what the status of WP is regarding advertising any more. Wales advertises WP as commercial free. That is NOT true by any stretch of the imagination. In this article we have some blatent advertising. What do you want to do, here, Wales? The rules seems to say no advertising and everything in "cite web." We got a real problem with those rules, which apply to some and not others. But, I suppose it is only a problem to people like me, who want to take what people say at face value. Someone else might twist this around so it is NOT advertising, only expression of the basic facts concerning hotels and lodgings and what not. I don't have the time to fight you on it. It seems to me most of those have to come out and rest go in "cite web." What do you think? Whatever you think, put it here, don't bother me with it, I'm busy.Dave (talk) 15:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Pisa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pisa/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
One minor remark about Pisa article: In the geographical map, the city looks inside the sea, while it's about 10 Km from the coast (on the groud side, of course). You should move the red spot of the city location some pixels to the right. |
Last edited at 13:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Does anyone have an eye on this article. There was some pseudo-encyclopedic entry about how Pisa is hated by Florence, and some more vandalistic inserts. While Tuscan cities love to dislike each other, the statement as it was did neither provide any accurate information nor add any value.
Also, if those kids don't go away on their own, it may be advisable to semi-protect the article for a while... Averell (talk) 16:56, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
The section has been detailed more than others since its importance and in the wait of a specific WP article. Hope someone will be available and interested in writing it.Theologian81sp (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply