This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dear MUNer, I've removed your comment on the main page. What delegation are you? Assuming you are on the security council for Belfast, I will see you tomorrow!195.195.166.31 14:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
So is "As of 2002, Afghanistan is led by an interim government headed by Hamid Karzai" still true now it's 2003, and if so should it be updated? -- Nevilley 18:35 Feb 21, 2003 (UTC)
There ought to be a citation for this line: The remnants of the warlords are almost non-existent.SatanicPanic1 (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm not particularly knowing about Afghanistan, but I can tell that the following wording does not give a credible impression.
If only three countries of the world had recognized Afghanistan's Taliban government, then it's a contradiction to state that it lost recognition from "all other countries in the world". Further, the recognition of a government is linked to the government's control over a state, and recognition is not "revoked" unless the government loses the control. In other words, one would expect that the war against Afghanistan was the cause of the government's loss of recognition, not a terrorist attack against the United States. -- Johan Magnus 00:52 19 May 2003 (UTC)
There is no need to analyze every link we put in. I think we should removed the lengthy descriptions. --Jiang 00:20, 7 Sep 2003 (UTC)
The whole point of the lengthy source descriptions was that contributors could use them to review and then make their own contribution to the article, which clearly relies on too few sources and needs a lot of revision.
This is obviously an article in transition. I personally need both a TOC and an annotated source listing so I can work on providing more depth and breadth to the article. Cut and pasted material from two CIA fact books is not sufficent.
Instead of constantly reverting I will create a separate entry that I can work on using the tools I need: namely, a detailed listing of sections and descriptions of the sources I, or anyone else, may want to use to revise.
At some point I'll resubmit it to this present entry, if appropriate. -- CBorges 05:31, 7 Sep 2003 (UTC)
This page needs a serious update of facts! For instance the constitution is in. I do not understand the necessaity of such a grim view of Afghanistan either, though I'm not very knolwedgeable in politics, I don't hear so much bad news from Afghanistan as this article suggests. Is anybody watching this page?
Bhs 10:17, 4 May 2004 (PDT)
Ya, I agree, this article was a mess. I fixed it now to the best of my ability. It so more up to date as of early 2005. I also removed the attention link. Still, I encourage others to help out in improving this article, perhaps to article of the month status?. It leaves so much still to be desired. Stranger
"Also, the system is quite new, implementation of which began only 2004, just after decades of war between different factions and warlords, the remnants of which is almost non existent. " This is grammatically broken, but I can't fix it without knowing what the referent to "remnants" was supposed to be? remnants of warlords? remnants of factions? remnants of decades? Its kinda too broken to fix--it needs to be rewritten probably, but I don't know what it is trying to say.
I put two {{update}} tags in there, both in the Elections and Legislative sections, because both mention the April 2005 elections from an advance perpective. (Very nice article, though!) PhilipR 19:02, 24 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
anyone against it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xiaden (talk • contribs) 15:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC).Reply
The article says that "With the exception of military junta..." Afghanistan has had every kind of political system, and then proceeds to list them. However, some of the examples given include capitalism and socialism. These are not political systems, rather economic systems, and besides that they are vaguely defined. Does "socialism" here mean command economy? Mixed market? Administrative welfare state? Does "capitalism" mean laissez-faire? Keynesian?
My point here is that the terminology here is not really specific and doesn't add to an understanding of Afghan politics. On the other hand specific terms like "pro-soviet communist state" are useful because it refers to the specific phenomenon of an authoritarian state controlled by a national Communist Party loyal to the USSR during the Cold War. Just my 2 cents. 88.11.125.125 (talk) 15:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
The government section of the "Outline of Afghanistan" needs to be checked, corrected, and completed -- especially the subsections for the government branches.
When the country outlines were created, temporary data (that matched most of the countries but not all) was used to speed up the process. Those countries for which the temporary data does not match must be replaced with the correct information.
Please check that this country's outline is not in error.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact The Transhumanist .
Thank you. kaleb cerar is awesome wich is (me)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.56.115.219 (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) Muhibm0307 (talk) 04:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Politics of Afghanistan → Politics of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan – The content about the Karzia-Ghani regime needs to be split from the high-level article about Politics of Afghanistan. Most of the edit history is relevant to that content so the history should be moved as well. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 01:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. CMD's draft can go in place of the old article. — Amakuru (talk) 10:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Politics of Afghanistan → Politics of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan – The content about the Karzia-Ghani regime needs to be split from the high-level article about Politics of Afghanistan. Most of the edit history is relevant to that content so the history should be moved as well. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 16:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Note: I filed an RM, which was speedy-closed as moved and then reverted. The "timeline" and "background" sections are the only part not about the Karzai-Ghani regime. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 16:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.