![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
trying to verify disputed claim (82.35.102.29 14:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC))Reply
Should we rename this article to Provisional ballot in the United States since it currently has a global tag? RJFJR (talk) 20:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
In the UK there is a similar procedure called a "tendered ballot". However, this is only used for situations where a voter is counted as already having voted, not for voters who are trying to vote without being registered. As such, they are not counted at all under normal circumstances, but are retained as evidence in case the election result is challenged. – Smyth\talk 11:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
It appears that the links to the 2004 EAC report and the 2006 EAC report are broken. Patphilly (talk) 22:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC).Reply
"One method used and misused is the practice of voter caging"
I believe this should be removed or amended to indicate it is illegal in the united states and has been since 1965, this seems to indicate it is still a common practice and I would have to believe if it was illegal it would not be.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Provisional ballot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply