Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Talk:Pulcheria





Article  

Talk  



Language  

Watch  

Edit  


Latest comment: 2 years ago by Billposer in topic Virginity
 


Learn more about this page

Dioscorus

edit

No mention of Pulcheria knocking out Dioscorus' teeth?

Untitled

edit

I will be doing a extensive re write of this page. I have at least ten different sources that I will be using to improve the page.

Project for school

edit

Hi I have done extensive research on the empress Pulcheria and have about 10 different sources. I will be doing a complete re-write of this page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpasby (talkcontribs) 06:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Substantiation needed

edit

The sentence "Pulcheria claimed that she herself had given birth to God, and that she was the Theotokos" needs direct, authoritative substantiation, as does the sentence "Through both councils, Pulcheria devoted the last years of her life to the idea that she was the Theotokos, ...."

WilsonClark (talk) 03:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Total darkness?

edit

This nonreliable source records Pulcheria's inaugeration day (Aug 25, 450) as a day without light and not an eclipse. Accurate with an original source? Should be mentioned. — LlywelynII 22:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quotes

edit

This article is largely made up of substantial quotes from other sources. They've been sourced and are explicitly shown as quotes, but they really do need some work to integrate them into the article. Sotakeit (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm confused the part about Aelia Eudocia and Monophysitism?

edit

First the Note linted to there, currently numbered as 33, seems to not actually anything about that. And second I thought objecting to the title Theotokos was a Nestorian thing?--JaredMithrandir (talk) 05:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Virginity

edit

I question the claim that Pulcheria honored her vow of virginity in spite of contracting "a legitimate marriage". The implication is that the marriage was not consummated. My understanding is that in the Roman Catholic Church a marriage that is not consummated is not a valid marriage. Indeed, lack of consummation is grounds for annulment. This could use clarification.Bill (talk) 19:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I just checked canon law. At least at present, in the Roman Catholic Church, a marriage that has not been consummated is valid but dissoluble. A marriage that has not been consummated is indissoluble. A marriage that could not be consummated, due to the physical inability of one or both parties, is invalid. So if the law was the same then as now, Pulcheria's vow of virginity would not invalidate the marriage.Bill (talk) 01:43, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pulcheria&oldid=1232668902"
 



Last edited on 5 July 2024, at 00:01  


Languages

 



This page is not available in other languages.
 

Wikipedia


This page was last edited on 5 July 2024, at 00:01 (UTC).

Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Terms of Use

Desktop